Giles Hussey vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 May at 07:05 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Hussey vs C. Ilkel

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hussey 1 - 0 Ilkel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Giles Hussey winning 2 and Cem Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Giles Hussey and Cem Ilkel was at the Tbilisi Challenger, 18-05-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Giles Hussey getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hussey | 1 |
| Ilkel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Tbilisi Challenger(05-18-25)
G. Hussey vs C. Ilkel H2H Profile
G. Hussey vs C. Ilkel Match Preview:
- Second serve performance: Hussey has a recent second serve win rate of 46.93%, slightly less than Ilkel's 47.05%. Could this minor difference affect the match outcome?
- Return game statistics indicate Hussey wins 42.37% of second serve returns compared to Ilkel's 40.43%. Hussey also performs better on first serve returns, with 31.32% to Ilkel's 24.72%.
- Under pressure, Hussey saves 54.1% of breakpoints, outperforming Ilkel's 50.18%. Is Hussey more resilient in critical moments?
- Match performance in the last year shows Hussey with a win rate of 58.14% (25 wins, 18 losses) and Ilkel with 61.02% (36 wins, 23 losses).
- Surface preference: Both players excel on hard courts, Hussey at 67% and Ilkel at 62%. Grass is less favorable, with Hussey at 25% and Ilkel at 10%.
- Event level shows Hussey has a 69.57% win rate in $10K tournaments, while Ilkel has a higher win rate of 73.17% at the same level.
- Opponents' average ranking is similar, with Hussey's at 426.84 and Ilkel's at 436.02, indicating comparable levels of competition.
- Deciding set performance: Hussey wins 56% of these, but Ilkel performs better with 64% wins in deciding sets.
- Breakpoint conversion: Ilkel recently converts 37.38% of breakpoints, marginally outperforming Hussey's 35.42%.
Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Hussey and Ilkel presents an intriguing contest between two closely matched players.
While Hussey demonstrates slightly better performance in return games and resilience under pressure, Ilkel has a marginally higher win rate overall and excels in converting breakpoints. Both players favor hard courts, yet Ilkel's performance in deciding sets suggests greater stamina or strategic prowess in critical moments.
Taking into account these factors, Ilkel holds a slight edge and is most likely to win the upcoming match.
Giles Hussey vs Cem Ilkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Hussey vs C. Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:54:47 | Average Match Time | 1:54:47 |
| 64% (61/95) | 1st Serve % | 54% (35/65) |
| 72% (44/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (28/35) |
| 44% (15/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 11% (1/9) |
| 35% (23/65) | Return Points Win % | 38% (36/95) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Hussey Recent Matches Played
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played

G. Hussey vs C. Ilkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.97% (199/117) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.52% (438/337) |
| 59.89% (439/294) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.63% (979/813) |
| 53.69% (3728/3216) | Games Win/Loss | 51.54% (8791/8267) |
| 66.50% (133/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.41% (288/181) |
| 65.71% (23/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.53% (57/71) |
| 61.67% (37/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.76% (92/76) |
| 28.57% (6/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 877 | Aces Total | 2865 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 743 | Total Double Faults | 1385 |
| 1:35:48 | Average Match Time | 1:15:9 |
| 475.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 560.74 |
| 62% (12023/19247) | 1st Serve % | 58% (24152/41308) |
| 67% (8085/12023) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16999/24152) |
| 51% (3674/7224) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8757/17156) |
| 44% (908/2077) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1622/4023) |
| 41% (8064/19545) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16247/41803) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 17.86% (5/23) |
| 52.24% (35/32) | Challenger W/L | 52.23% (176/161) |
| 66.67% (162/81) | Futures W/L | 66.39% (241/122) |
| 63% (194/310) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (426/756) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 51% (46/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (147/275) |
| 58% (57/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (130/233) |
| 85% (194/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (424/362) |
| 15% (194/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (424/60) |
| 29% (122/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (350/74) |